Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Friday, May 16, 2008

A Black Columnist on Obama


A Black Columnist on Obama



Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun



It's an amazing time to be alive in America . We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.



We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender.



Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.



The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.



Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.



Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate.



He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.



Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America . But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty.."



Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s.



Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.



Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago.



Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich.." How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes.



His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.



Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois , he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood , and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.



The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches.



His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.



But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.



It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.




Kind of scary, wouldn't you think



According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is:



The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??



I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to repost this as many times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet...do it!



If you think I am crazy,. I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the "unknown" candidate

Sunday, April 27, 2008

What if the White Man cannot accept Obama or Clinton?

The scary thing about electing Obama or Clinton
is the repercussions of the white man. I don't
mean the educated white man as much as the uneducated
white man. The KKK man or the "red neck" white man.
There are some men who don't appreciate women. There
are some white men who don't appreciate people of color.
Herein lies the dilemma.
If either Obama or Clinton are elected, there are
people out there who are not going to enjoy having
them be our President. For a nickel and a cup of coffee,
they may decide that we don't need them in office and
well , you know what I am saying. I do believe that we
have some lunatics in the world, Charles Manson and
company being part of that group, and they are not
governed by the same set of rules that we abide by.
Given the opportunity, or by chance waking up one
morning in an irritable mood,could cause someone
to make a bad judgement call. These people that
are crazy and set off by different emotions than average
white men, may hear another drummer if you know what
I mean. I am not implying any of this , I just bring
it up as a potential future prediction. I hate to say
I told you so.

But What If?

Monday, April 14, 2008

What if we elect Clinton or Obama?

Everyone is complaining about Bush. Everyone is blaming the
economy and the price of gas on the Republicans. At which
point did President Bush or the Republicans raise the cost
of gasoline or change the economy? We are all Americans,
the Congress dictates which laws are passed and put
before the American people.
What if we elect Clinton or Obama? So far I have only
heard fussing and fighting and denouncement, or
ridicule of each other. Not what I really look for
in a Presidential candidate.
Where or when are we going to hear about the issues?
How would they settle the war? How would they change
the economy? How would they fix the social security
if there is a problem?
Every time you think they might address the questions
of the day one of them slips up and says something
that the media doesn't like, so they blow it all out
of proportion and the general population has a new topic
over the water fountain the next morning.
Does McCain have all the answers? Probably not. At least
he is not out there on the campaign trail avoiding
the issues.
You might not always agree with him , but you are not
always going to agree with the other candidates either.
What if we scrap the whole lot of them and get some
other people to run. Someone without a grudge or
bad feeling in their bones. Somebody like Aunt Bee
from Mayberry or Gomer Pyle. Oh wait, you say they
are just made up characters or actors and actresses.
Do you see where I am going with this? What is the
difference between them and what we have running
for office now? I am not saying we should change anything.
I am just asking What If?